Search found 63 matches
- Sat Aug 06, 2016 4:43 pm
- Forum: Technical questions
- Topic: HWID decoding in C++
- Replies: 3
- Views: 8865
Re: HWID decoding in C++
Thanks for this. Website API Fixed. Hi, I'm trying to decode the HWID in C++ but with no luck. Is there an example for that in C++? Should it be decoded as UTF-8 or ISO-8859-1? Are there any modifications after decoding? I have read all the topics and replies I could find on this forum. I also tried...
- Sun Oct 25, 2015 9:36 am
- Forum: Technical questions
- Topic: Hardware ID inconsistent on Double CPU
- Replies: 7
- Views: 10361
Re: Hardware ID inconsistent on Double CPU
yes.
it would be great that the HW-ID contains all the CPUs (just like Ethernet)
it would be great that the HW-ID contains all the CPUs (just like Ethernet)
- Sat Oct 24, 2015 9:30 pm
- Forum: Technical questions
- Topic: VMProtect 3.0.6 stuck on saving and cost over 19GB ram
- Replies: 8
- Views: 12279
Re: VMProtect 3.0.6 stuck on saving and cost over 19GB ram
where did you get the vmp 3.0.6 ?
I only have 3.0.5
I want to try new versions as well
I only have 3.0.5
I want to try new versions as well
- Sat Oct 24, 2015 6:36 pm
- Forum: Technical questions
- Topic: Hardware ID inconsistent on Double CPU
- Replies: 7
- Views: 10361
Re: Hardware ID inconsistent on Double CPU
The problem is that no matter which VMP, it only picks up 1 CPU if there are 2 CPU in the hardware ID.
- Thu Oct 22, 2015 3:27 pm
- Forum: Technical questions
- Topic: Hardware ID inconsistent on Double CPU
- Replies: 7
- Views: 10361
Re: Hardware ID inconsistent on Double CPU
Yes,
but in this case, from the HW-ID, they are totally different.
if there is only 1 CPU, both versions produce different HW-ID strings but it doesn't matter if these strings mean the same PC.
but in this case, from the HW-ID, they are totally different.
if there is only 1 CPU, both versions produce different HW-ID strings but it doesn't matter if these strings mean the same PC.
- Thu Oct 22, 2015 10:16 am
- Forum: Technical questions
- Topic: VMProtect doesn't treat (VirtualBox only 1 core) as under VM
- Replies: 0
- Views: 14916
VMProtect doesn't treat (VirtualBox only 1 core) as under VM
VMProtect doesn't treat (VirtualBox only 1 core) as under VM
Under VMBox, if you specify the instance with more than 1 CPU, then VMProtect detects the VM correcty, but not if only 1 CPU
Under VMBox, if you specify the instance with more than 1 CPU, then VMProtect detects the VM correcty, but not if only 1 CPU
- Thu Oct 22, 2015 8:15 am
- Forum: Technical questions
- Topic: Hardware ID inconsistent on Double CPU
- Replies: 7
- Views: 10361
Hardware ID inconsistent on Double CPU
I have just purchased a machine Intel XEON X5650 CPU X 2 (2 CPUs) https://helloacm.com/review-hpz800-server-workstation-hp-z800-workstation-desktop-pc-tower-computer-powerhouse-2x-intel-xeon-x5650-48gb-ddr3-memory-2tb-hdd-1gb-nvidia-quadro/ and the Hardware ID I've got are two: 4JlBzbUkAAgGsIFbwtffK...
- Sat Oct 10, 2015 9:08 am
- Forum: Technical questions
- Topic: VMP 3.0.5 drops support for Windows XP
- Replies: 2
- Views: 6287
Re: VMP 3.0.5 drops support for Windows XP
so many VMP releases recently...
- Tue Oct 06, 2015 12:44 pm
- Forum: Technical questions
- Topic: Expert options missing?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 6275
Re: Expert options missing?
In my case,
my original DLL is around 12MB, and after protection (without packing), the size goes up to 16MB
my original DLL is around 12MB, and after protection (without packing), the size goes up to 16MB
- Mon Oct 05, 2015 7:43 am
- Forum: Technical questions
- Topic: Hardware ID and Decoder
- Replies: 2
- Views: 20761
Re: Hardware ID and Decoder
Thank you, fixed.
- Fri Sep 18, 2015 12:19 pm
- Forum: Technical questions
- Topic: VMP3 is slow in packing
- Replies: 0
- Views: 15111
VMP3 is slow in packing
VMP3 tends to be slow packing then VMP2.x (and it does not have a Fast-Packing option). I have to disable this function because the protected DLL needs to be loaded/unloaded multiple times. Unpacked DLL size = 20M and Packed DLL size = 5M If the speed is of importance and file size is less important...
- Sat Sep 12, 2015 11:03 pm
- Forum: Technical questions
- Topic: Hardware ID and Decoder
- Replies: 2
- Views: 20761
Hardware ID and Decoder
Make a page on decoding VMProtect Hardware ID, API available (and implementation details) for those who need it. https://helloacm.com/decode-hardware-id/ Also, a Win32 and Win64 Executable is available on that page for getting Hardware ID. https://helloacm.com/decode-hardware-id/hardware-id-vmp.jpg
- Tue Sep 08, 2015 8:18 pm
- Forum: Technical questions
- Topic: Floating point instruction virtualization error
- Replies: 4
- Views: 6756
Re: Floating point instruction virtualization error
Wow... so much to learn! Hi, I was testing latest version of VMProtect (3.0.2.470) and it seems that it cannot virtualize fldcw instruction. What's interesting its counterpart fstcw compiles without problems. Here's a minimal sample to reproduce this issue (compile using VS): __declspec(noinline) vo...
- Wed Sep 02, 2015 9:43 pm
- Forum: Technical questions
- Topic: VMP3.0.2 reviews
- Replies: 0
- Views: 14452
VMP3.0.2 reviews
Hello, thanks for hard work these days on VMP3 improvements. I've just tested and here are my findings. 1. unpacking is faster than VMP3.0.1 but still slower than VMP2.13 (fastest packing) 2. i got 1 different hardware ID on same machine: 2D3kAM0SPGTvlO2rCluQwsbdej4= previously, here are 3 other dif...
- Wed Sep 02, 2015 12:43 pm
- Forum: Technical questions
- Topic: Pack the output in VMP3
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5380
Re: Pack the output in VMP3
So, i don't use memory protection and basically turned off all markers.. so I guess nothing to do with new VM... why it is observed slower than 2.13? Is the unpacking algorithm changed? and in VMP2.13.5 you can select the level of compression rate, which is really good.. Unfortunately it's impossibl...